The answer to the question "Who is behind the poisoning of Iranian schoolgirls?" will be determined gradually and by the investigations by Iran's security organizations, for speculation, it is enough to see who is the winner in this network sabotage, and who is the loser.
There are at least five reasons to reveal the role of the anti-Iranian movement supported by the West in this horrendous sabotage.
1. For more than a year, the anti-Iranian movement supported by the West has been trying to recruit teenage girls in schools. During the recent riots in Iran, they also tried to take advantage of the teenage excitement of schoolgirls, which went awry – except in a handful of cases. Taking this hypothesis into account, isn't refocusing on girls' schools a continuance of the same cultural-security project?
2. After the failure of recent riots in Iran, the West is trying to resuscitate these protests, and in their viewpoint, poisoning Iranian schoolgirls is a suitable technique to revive the riots.
3. Maryam Rajavi the ringleader of the Mujahedin terrorist group (MKO), who has on her hands the blood of thousands of Iranian citizens and officials, was the first person to tweet about these poisonings a few weeks ago, while the poisonings had not yet reached Tehran. She said that the poisoning of Iranian schoolgirls now is in Tehran and ignorantly let the cat out of the bag. Recently, in a statement, she requested a street rally.
This is while the people of Iran have not yet forgotten the assassination of children and teenagers in different cities of Iran in the 80s.
4. In recent months, there have been incidents and crimes that Western and Saudi media have tried to suggest that the Iranian government has been behind them, e.g. the terror attacks that took place in the Shah Cheragh Holy Shrine in Shiraz, and Izeh in Khouzestan Province.
5. After these poisonings, Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's last shah, who has been living a luxurious life in the West for several decades with the property loot taken from the Iranian people, openly announced in an interview that Iran should be subjected to severe additional economic sanctions so that people take to streets to protest, which means that they consider this incident to be a prelude to putting more pressure on the people in order to revive the protests.
Now, the other side of the story
The Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran is a country where 60% of its university students and one-third of its faculty members are women. A country that has raised the literacy rate of girls from 44% in 1979 to 99% in 2020 after the Islamic Revolution; not to mention the position of women in sports and scientific and career advances and management positions, etc.
Can such a country be against girls' going to school? With these details, who benefits from the poisoning of female students? Iranian government or its enemies?
6125**9417
Your Comment