- Issuing this statement by England, Germany and France had no logical justification because it was published at a time when USA and Iran exchanged their proposed texts in the field of nuclear negotiations and were reviewing and evaluating them. Records show that the Europeans break the barrier by declaring unreasonable positions when the relative conditions for agreement are provided. We saw an example of this in the visit of Mr. Grossi to Iran and conducting negotiations in a positive atmosphere, after the return of the head of the Atomic Energy Organization, the European Troika initiated a resolution against Iran. These actions indicate that these three countries are influenced by the false information of the Israel. While Iran participated logically and intelligently in the Vienna negotiation and Qatar talks and has taken a constructive approach.
- The statement of England, Germany and France was issued on the eve of the meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors. In a situation where the Board of Governors had announced that it would not issue a resolution against Iran and had taken a relatively appropriate approach compared to the past, it is completely illogical for these three European countries to accuse Iran of disrupting the negotiation environment. This action of the troika shows that they intend to influence the decisions of the council members as before. The three European countries are coordinating the negotiations and are not in a position to influence the negotiation process by issuing a political statement. Russia took a position immediately after the Troika's action and declared the statement unconstructive and misplaced, and the Chinese did not welcome this statement, and this indicated the invalidity of the Troika's action.
- The aim of the three European countries was to instill the fact that Iran does not have the political will to resolve the JCPOA issue. This claim is made while Iran has so far shown its determination to reach an agreement, and if there is to be a defendant for the failure of the negotiations, it is the United States in the first place and three European countries in the second place that have no will to resolve the issue. During the recent negotiations, the Islamic Republic of Iran showed reasonable flexibility while insisting on its principled positions; But the Americans, in addition to disrupting the implementation period of the JCPOA, illegally withdrew from this agreement, and the Europeans did not show any will to force the Americans to return to the JCPOA. England, Germany and France were reluctant even about INSTEX and solving some of Iran's economic problems, and the reason for this inaction was the dependence of these countries on America. In fact, these three countries have their hands tied in front of the United States and do not have the courage and power to protest against the United States in the current situation.
- The European Union is a non-united institution and its members take inconsistent positions due to their differences regarding the Ukraine crisis and how to deal with Russia and sanctions against this country. Usually, England acts in favor of America, and Germany and France have also played a neutral role with two-sided positions. It seems that the intention of Germany, France, and England by publishing a statement against Iran was to show that they agree with each other in some areas, and with this action they both removed themselves from isolation, so this statement is only for expressing It existed and had no other value.
- Due to the sanctions imposed on Iran's intelligence minister by the US in recent days, it was expected that the European Troika would issue a statement condemning this illegal and harmful action to the nuclear negotiations. While they did not show any reaction to this illegal action of America and issued a politically ineffective statement against Iran that harms the negotiation process. The European Union should also refrain from repeating baseless cases and adopting political positions, because with these actions, it will be more exposed to criticism and mistrust from the Iranian side. Naturally, the Islamic Republic of Iran does not accept any commitments before the implementation of America's commitments and the lifting of oppressive sanctions, and when America returns to its commitments, Iran will also return to its commitments.
9416**1583
Follow us on Twitter @IrnaEnglish
Your Comment