Washington's special envoy Robert Malley, also presented a plan that had been proposed in Vienna last March and Tehran had opposed it.
Al-Quds al-Arabi in its report, with the introduction to the United States' breakthroughs in the negotiations, wrote that the plan that the US had offered was a document to surrender, on the basis of which, Iran should withdraw its nuclear rights , and in reaction, some sanctions will be lifted " temporarily" and Iran 's nuclear facilities to be monitored by the IAEA.
According to al-Quds al-Arabi, Iran's deputy foreign minister and top negotiator Ali Bagheri Kani in his meeting with Deputy secretary general of the European External Action Service, Enrique Mora, emphasized that Tehran wants guarantees and neither Iranian and American sides changed their position Iranian and American sides changed their position, thus , there was a sharp tension in Washington and the European sides, but nonetheless , all sides stressed that negotiations should continue.
According to the report , the reason for no progress of the talks in Doha Talks was deeper than direct factors that Iran and the United States put forward, as the two countries agreed with different strategies in the talks and it was natural not to achieve any results .
Al-Quds-Al-Arab went on to say that the aim of the Iranian strategy is to achieve a strong and permanent agreement which Tehran will continue to work on its basis without worrying or threatening, in other words, Iran has not entered into negotiations with the need to get temporary gains, but Iran is under no pressure and will not give concessions to the US.
According to the newspaper, the aim of the American strategy in the negotiations is to achieve a short-term agreement unlike Iran's favored agreement that is intermediate and based on genuine progress.
Accordingly, the American negotiation strategy arose from the concept of "crisis management" rather than "crisis solving", that is to say, this agreement is needed to understand the logic of American negotiations.
According to the report , the US negotiation strategy is influenced by many pressures, and is closely related to the timing of the inter - parliamentary elections, as fears are that The Republicans would win the majority of the Senate.
The next reason is foreign and is related to the Ukrainian war and the spread of the fighting front in Europe and Asia as a result of the energy crisis in capitalist countries, this crisis will lead to an increase in inflation and failure to control inflation, therefore, the United Sates is under internal and external pressures.
Al-Quds al-Arabi also reported that the US would negotiate with Iran with the logic that a small country should not have nuclear capability. This logic is naive and ridiculous because the United States cannot understand that Iran had a big leap in its nuclear program last year.
According to the newspaper, the most important reason of the nuclear boom is that Iran has devised a strategy to include the nuclear industry in its economy, from the agricultural sector to health workers, oil, gas and electricity.
Accordingly, these are indicative of the peaceful nuclear program of Iran, and this country has even recently been able to build a nuclear power plant, which will lead to a nuclear power market in the world in the coming months.
Al-Quds al-Arabi concluded that the difference of strategy in negotiation means a large gap in the stances of the parties.
To conclude the negotiations, the gap must be reduced. This is possible only if the US shows enough courage to accept the existing facts and to abandon its arrogance.
I pointed out that the US will not be able to reach the conclusion as long as it does not have the right impression of negotiations.
6125**2059
Follow us on Twitter @IrnaEnglish